The battle about whether or not Britney Spears should pay thousands and thousands in authorized charges amassed by her father when he was conservator of her property isn’t over, however an L.A. court docket has dominated that the performer ought to have management over her cash and didn’t allow assets to be preserved within the conservatorship till that’s lastly agreed.
Attorneys defending Britney and Jamie Spears, in addition to others associated to the now-defunct conservatorship, sparred in a tense Wednesday afternoon session earlier than Choose Brenda Penny over fees of misbehavior, press leaks, and who ought to deal with the star’s cash.
For the unconverted, there was a battle over Jamie’s persevering with authorized charges and whether or not or not they need to be billable to Britney’s property due to his prior function as conservator.
In a declaration submitted with the opposition, an FBI particular agent employed by Rosengart’s agency acknowledged that Jamie’s troubled monetary previous and accusations made by a safety agency whistleblower about tapping Britney’s iPhone and putting in a secret audio recording system in her bed room that was reported by The New York Occasions.
The Black Field safety whistleblower says Jamie consumed cash from the property to pay to analyze some #FreeBritney activists and alleged that proof reveals he mismanaged funds.